installed (again) on sony vaoi ultrabook using ISO 2020-01-17; (UEFI, full disk, NO-encryption, internet)
grub did not show; a couple of reboots & I couldn't get grub to show.

Installed today's daily (2020-01-15) on hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 5gb, nvidia quadro nvs 290) (BIOS, full disk, internet)
rebooted; logged in (forgot to look at grub; was focused on finishing qa-test install)
sudo apt update; sudo apt full-upgrade; reboot

Installed Lubuntu 20.04 (2020-01-04 ISO), (d755-8, c2d, 8gb, radeon hd 2400, BIOS) for T119
Sorry grub appeared as text, no pretty picture, no blue logo :(
(update as requested on iIRC)

Installed Lubuntu 20.04 (2020-01-04 ISO), (d755-8, c2d, 8gb, radeon hd 2400, BIOS)

I'll get around to reviewing them all some time... I've restarted many times, but another added..

kc2bez: "It could probably use a little jazzing up but the basics are there."

Just booted a 20.04 install [dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350)] that I hadn't used in awhile (used for testing & support so maybe pretty clean/default unless I've changed things for support-testing). Opening screensaver options on boot and it was set (*one saver*) to an uninstalled 'flurry'. On preview it only got black screens with error (uninstalled). I did a apt full-upgrade and when I returned the screensavers were working (flurry on both displays).

Can you check the lock screen dialogue box and relay your findings on T119 ?
I had just live booted to check. can't really get to a password entering box in live

I added PPA onto 20.04 sony vaio ultrabook (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT); and installed redshift-qt there (no redshift was installed). This box wasn't updated first and I started play it crashed pretty quickly (problem encountered; nothing in /var/crash/); I'd intended updating whilst I played.... I'll blame the non-upgrading first; though my internet has been flapping (no connection 6-7 times per hour for a ~minute) so maybe it wasn't getting geoclue responses?? Sorry I closed it & rebooted to start again before it occurred to me I should explore (stuck on the no full-upgrade first!)

@hmollercl,

When I refer to "no issues" I mean the icon remains readable (globe outline, red-globe etc), not a "!" or blue-box/diamond....

• initial play (very early);

My main box (d960): Redshift-qt's panel icon was a blue box/diamond with a light blue icon partially visible, I no longer recall when the "!" got replaced by the blue-box sorry. I can see the package there (in browser) but sudo apt update didn't see it available so I wget & dpkg -i installed on my 20.04 primary box; I used the 'quit' option to have program quit & restarted it. It was back to "!" icon set; operation appears identical & I didn't see any differences (very short play; it'll take days to test properly with color shifting due to time). Maybe it needs a logout/login; test that later...
This is my primary box; very non-standard config & rebooted about once a week

This is a little late, but I've tested the PPA (https://launchpad.net/~hmollercl/+archive/ubuntu/redshift-qt) on a 19.10 box (d780) without issue and my primary system running 20.04 (d960) without issue.

I'll do whatever I did last time, as I recall that was

@wxl mentioned testcases; so I queried "Replace a partition" using Calamares text; I've opted to add a test rather than modify the "Replace a partition" as it really tested for something different (in my mind anyway).

Neyder noted (#lubuntu-devel) that the LIVE test case mentions Ubiquity & has references to picking timezone.... prior to "Try FAMILY"

To me they were ready Sept 24, however https://code.launchpad.net/~guiverc/ubuntu-manual-tests/lubuntu-calamares shows

'people' names committed - READY FOR REVIEW please. @wxl @tsimonq2

no issues at all with 'rough draft', thought it looked very polished

@tsimonq2 or @wxl - the existing test cases all have a number (eg. I've based mine on 1701 for new installs, and 1310 for upgrades). What numbers shall I give them? or where do I get the numbers? (or can it be any unused number?, isn't there a some document/procedure for claiming numbers?)

I have also committed the TUI (text user interface) upgrade
Please note: There have been no changes since 1-Sept-2019's comment & diff

As I wrongly wrote on D43, booted 19.10 daily (2019-09-13) on

• sony vaio ultrabook (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
• hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600)

Check if meta+r opens runner.
Check if pressing search key opens runner.
Check if Ctrl+Alt+B opens browser.
Check if pressing Homepage key opens browser.

In T21#2311, @wxl wrote:

@tsimonq2, (I was supposed to mention @ standup but i had my usual *blank/empty mind* at meeting)..

@tsimonq2 I'm stuck with GUI upgrade..

Do you want TUI & GUI release-upgrade testcases also on iso.qa...?
I don't recall seeing them for any other flavor, though I have found http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1310/info which IS used by Ubuntu Budgie and appears with their other tests as a 'run-once'.

• Pushed [bazaar] & merge request done thru launchpad

I can't currently login to notes.lubuntu.me so I'll flood-post here (delete or move if it's a problem)

It doesn't view very well now, but my 'reply' was based on P38 with a Y/N placed before each. Yep=worked, Nah=no.

New 19.10 install (2019-08-26 daily), on dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 5000/6000/7350/8350)
(I have apt-get installed clementine so I could have music play in background) & changed monitor-settings (swapped left-right & my-right display is portrait-left)

I'm playing with wxl/testy compton, and noted a

My testing results are :-

I don't believe anything shows any differently for secure+EFI boot, (vs efi) so it'll use identical testcases as EFI.

In T56#2000, @wxl wrote:

...

Therefore, I believe the testcase should provide instructions to:

• Check to see if the target drive has any mounted partitions
• Unmount any partitions if found

…before launching the installer.

I just booted [19.10] daily on vaiocrap & noticed an OEM option at grub; maybe we should have testcase(s) for that??
(i'm starting EFI set)

They will be new testcases; the files currently are all local (diffs online were a form of backup, though created at that point as I wanted two to speed creation of the fourth one via copy/paste); I haven't yet done the vm install to verify fourth is good. I don't yet understand the upload steps which is why they're all local - but I'll/we'll get there.

Thanks Walter & Dan too.

:) I didn't think of swap, and that would apply to all systems I tested on.
and easy to deal with in a text line; I'm thinking we ask testers to leave a comment on that one

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Cvvx77Gv5r/
has the ~/.cache/Calamares/session.log file.
I hadn't exited the installer at that stage, it was grabbed when it was at the

• install alongside
• replace partition
• manual partitioning

question, ie. no erase disk & install option provided. Single 80gb disk; partitions for /, swap & /home only

Our current (testcase 1701) is written for "Erase Disk" however it doesn't always show.

On hp dx6120 using Lubuntu 19.04 x86

I ran the installer a few times & made notes (largely a comparison between 19.10's install and the manual), right now I have no idea where those notes are (pad.ubuntu.com as I recall, but i'll have to find the email or whatever breadcrumb I left for myself to locate it). I also downloaded existing testcases and then looked at alternate editors as I felt my usual editor would be error prone (I didn't like how it appeared).

Opened k3b & created a favorites.k3b file with some my local mp3 directory (data project). Exited k3b.
Using pcmanfm-qt found the favorites.k3b file, it opened correctly in k3b

Your response got a HUGE howl of laughter when I read it @apt-ghetto, followed very quickly by the reddest face possible....

• Testing MAGNET LINKS (note: done on two boxes; d780 [upgraded last fri-sat] & d960 [fulyl-upgraded]

There's also an equally [*bad but quick*] Software image added to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Marketing/Lenny (Lubuntu modern logo overlayed on top of old LXDE symbol)

19.10 daily [2019-07-18] with -proposed calamares 3.2.11 installed, install using 'manual-partitioning' into partition (no encryption) flawless (default american english unchanged on first language choice)
19.10 daily [2019-07-18] with -proposed calamares 3.2.11 installed, install using 'replace-partition' into partition (no encryption) flawless (switched to british-english on first language choice)
19.10 daily [2019-07-18] with -proposed calamares 3.2.11 installed, install using 'replace-partition' into partition (encryption), british-english chosen first language choice, prior to booting this I rebooted into live & looked at hdd, luks partition where installed should be; I tried wrong passwords & couldn't access. I booted hdd with wrong passwords, unable to get in, final boot using correct password & was in; all looks good.

1280x800 (16:10) j3400 ; host 18.04 LTS but I didn't change GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR line so no logo

I just had a really good QA-test using 19.10 daily.
(following bits copied from my comments on test)

@The_LoudSpeaker as requested via irc

With changes made as requested by @apt-ghetto - fyi: d780 & I stopped timer to find my phone

Tested on vaio (uefi) & looks good. (for some reason it's grub is reporting 19.04; a qa-test 19.10 install pre-release and I don't know why, but it's my only uefi box and I hadn't noticed this before).