In D79#1705, @The_LoudSpeaker wrote:

In D79#1704, @rikmills wrote:

I cannot comment much on the validity of depends/patches etc, but the following things occur to me.

• debian added debian/upstream/metadata which you have not merged. Why? If you intended to exclude it, this is not mentioned in the changelog.
• you have not merged the change to depending on debhelper-compat (= 12) and corresponding removal of debian/compat. Again why, and why not mentioned?
• you have not merged some minor changes to debian/copyright which look like they should have been.

MoM itself didn't include them. It is probably coz MoM merges 3 versions: upstream, debian and previous ubuntu one AND This change in debian is actually before previous ubuntu version (As seen from the merged changelog), hence not included (It was also not included in previous ubuntu version if I am not wrong).

I cannot comment much on the validity of depends/patches etc, but the following things occur to me.

it's less than easy to get the Phabricator repos updated to match the archive if you upload before landing

The changelog entry does not match the one you uploaded, and omits the merged debian entries.

Adam Conrad has updated your meta to drop i386. You did not have this change in lubuntu git, which is why there is this mess.

Single Sign On

Ah, you had a software-properties-drivers-lxqt.desktop as well!

So I mean, like:

In T15#647, @hmollercl wrote:

Now we don't have menu entries for it, don't know why.

In T15#637, @tsimonq2 wrote:

It landed in the release pocket 45 mins ago. Please, someone upgrade to it and test it ASAP.

In T15#376, @hmollercl wrote:

maybe run it with sudo instead of lxqt-sudo ???

In T15#373, @hmollercl wrote:

does Kubuntu want to have software-properties-qt?