@hmollercl yes, in manjaro and arcolinux picom is the replacement to compton.

I have a machine with 1 gb of ram and it is impossible to navigate without a lightweight browser. the system works correctly if you don't open the browser. I think a gb of ram would be the minimum and 2 the recommended amount.

Bumping this task.
adding new insights:
https://blog.lxde.org/2016/10/04/benchmark-memory-usage-lxqt-desktop-environment-vs-xfce/

I think this called picom now

Is the KDE module to do that.

But actually as we look at the commits-I think Alf also maintains Git and Salsa-fair to say they are probably on the same page. Is Debian willing to take sddm-config-editor or is it already there? It looks like it doesn't exist.

So update-still hasn't been untouched and I'm looking at it right now. We probably will end up being maintainers but if we can at least get it working that's progress. I'm working on testing a build right now.

@ItzSwirlz You decided, that this will not be SRUed?

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2020-05-21: #1

Things werent clear with the seed-but I think for now in Calamares Minimal should be welcomed-or a package chooser of some sort before stepping further.

Doesn't it already do this?

Tested with QA-test install 20200607
on: Acer [Aspire] E3-111-P60S with UEFI+secure boot with encryption.
All looks good - no errors encountered.

/me likes the blue :)

because it would look more uniform with UEFI.

I wonder if it would be better to set a black background instead of blue in the Legacy Boot...

Added to a fresh qa-test install of [20.10/]groovy on
dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e8300, 8gb, amd/ati radeon rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)

I re-tested the ACER -UEFI machine with a fresh install ISO 31.05.20 Groovy and there was no problem with the wallpaper as in my first report.

Hi @Leok
Thank you very much for testing! I think, you are testing too much. It is enough to install the PPA on different hardware and tell us, if the plymouth theme looks good.

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:apt-ghetto/ppa-test-lubuntu
sudo apt update
sudo apt full-upgrade

I did not change anything with the wallpaper. And the changes in plymouth-theme-lubuntu-logo should not affect in any way the behaviour of pcmanfm-qt.

Another quick test on Groovy 20.10 ISO 30.05.2020

Ran a quick test on Groovy 20.10 ISO 30.05.2020

Quoted Text " Could you please do some tests, when you have time in the next 5 weeks, with different machines (different vendors, UEFI and BIOS)? I have prepared packages in my PPA for groovy and focal."

In T131#3539, @JacobSawicki wrote:

EDIT - New link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i4VFWzR46TBtpdunXsgTlj2Zd-6kZePw/view?usp=sharing

I'm sorry to take so long.

That is absolutely no problem. I will not have much time the next 5 weeks.

EDIT - New link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i4VFWzR46TBtpdunXsgTlj2Zd-6kZePw/view?usp=sharing

I've opened Pull Request #1 on GitHub:
https://github.com/lubuntu-team/lubuntu-meta-packaging/pull/1

A minimal could be used. In Ubuntu Cinnamon, to keep the architectures there and keep the repo clean (so there isn't the same file over and over of the same file with -(arch), we use a script that has:

Not going to lie-but looking at the commits this seems inactive. Alf's Salsa looks good and we can influence off of their packaging-but I'm not sure if it's worth it with it's current activity. We may end up turning ourselves into the upstream maintainers.

I have not experienced this issue at all. Bear in mind, the required QML might already be installed on an Ubuntu Studio or Lubuntu setup, both of which use Qt desktops.

It looks like nobody has done this yet-for even UbuntuDDE and Lumina-this has been successful. @Eickmeyer do you experience a similar problem?

That is how it looks on my UEFI test machine

OK

I have uploaded packages for 20.04 and 20.10 to my PPA with your artwork.