Tue, May 19
Sun, May 17
Jan 5 2020
@wxl give me the valid link and I'll poke it in.
@tsimonq2 it doesn't seem like this is resolved when https://manual.lubuntu.me/lts doesn't seem to go anywhere or rather it seems to go to https://manual.lubuntu.me/stable/lts which is obviously not valid. Perhaps this one is @teward's fault????
Dec 15 2019
In case I didn't make myself clear, Lyn, I do not envision this as another thing to lump on your plate. I mean, hey, if you want to add to your TODO list, knock yourself out, but you already do so much.
This seems like it would be a nice enhancement to the fantastic manual we already have. I would be willing to help with this project as time permits. I know AntiX / MX linux has a fair bit for video content that Dolphin Oracle put together. It seems to be a well utilized resource for them. I don't think there are too many other distros that have as much content as they do. I think like the current manual this could be something that could evolve over time, continually improving on the last iteration so I don't think we should focus too much about the initial quality.
Thing is I have never edited videos before. I also hate listening to the sound of my own voice.
Dec 14 2019
Oct 17 2019
Oct 12 2019
The plan is that manual.lubuntu.me would automatically redirect to the stable branch.
Oct 3 2019
I was asking more for where https://manual.lubuntu.me/ what to have redirect to. I think almost all of the branches are named that other than LXDE which 18.04 is basically a copy as I could not find an easy way to rename a git branch rather than take a new branch with a new name and delete the old and did not delete the old.
Bump, because I'd like to deploy this on release day if it's feasible.
Oct 1 2019
That's a good idea. What about renaming the old branches to follow XX.YY? We could then follow the existing procedure, and you could go ahead and delete branches when you think it's necessary.
Sep 30 2019
Agreed this is is similar to what I want right now. I mean I don't see the point in keeping old realeases published without support. I really don't think getting rid of the branches in the git tree would be best. I say keep old versions of source in branches around as that is easy if say we end up switching back to an program from a previous release So I don't have to start over from scratch. This is really similar to what I wanted. The only other question is what would just the old manual url link to if say someone had a URL saved to get to it.
Aug 13 2019
May 29 2019
Apr 15 2019
I made a Pull Request on Github to fill the content of the release notes a bit. A lot of the content I have copy&pasted from the previous release notes and adjusted some numbers.